FORMER governor of Abia State and Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA) candidate in the March 5, 2016, Abia North senatorial rerun election, Dr. Orji Uzor Kalu, has asked the Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Umuahia to recount the votes he acquired during the rerun election and declare him winner.
Kalu made the remarks during his interaction with
newsmen at the end of tribunal’s sitting on Tuesday having opened his case
before the tribunal, and emphatically prays the tribunal to declare him winner
of the Abia North Senatorial election having polled majority of lawful
votes cast...
“I want the tribunal to recount the votes and declare me
winner because I won the election. However, Kalu could not conclude his
testimony after mounting the witness box because the tribunal had agreed with
counsel to adjourn for the day.
INEC had declared the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Mao Ohuabunwa, winner of the rerun.
INEC had declared the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Mao Ohuabunwa, winner of the rerun.
The former governor also reiterated his firm confidence
in the judiciary to do the needful stressing that he was hopeful that justice
will certainly prevail at the end in his favour by restoring the mandate given
to him by the electorates in his senatorial district.
Earlier, a forensic expert, DSP Reginald Odunze, had
stated that under cross-examination that INEC did not provide him materials in
respect of the election in Umuelem and Eziama Agbo and therefore unable to
include them in his reports adding that altogether, a total of 11,464 ballot
papers and 4,213 result sheets were examined.
The returning officer for the election, Dr. Nwankwo
Nduka explained he declared the rerun inconclusive because the number of votes
outstanding were more than the margin of win insisting that by INEC’s
regulations for the election, he had the power to declare an election
inconclusive and order a supplementary election.
However, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) opposed the
testimony of the forensic expert on the ground that what he had deposed to was
an affidavit, which was taken care of in the evidence Act.

No comments:
Post a Comment