![]() |
Dr. Bukola Saraki |
FEDERAL High Court Judge, Justice Abdulkadir
Kafarati, yesterday declined to give judgment in the case of enforcement of
fundamental human rights instituted before him by Senate President, Dr.
Abubakar Bukola Saraki citing allegation
of N2billion bribery against him as the reason for the decision.
Kafarati stated that he got a report in the media
indicating that he was induced to deliver judgment in the favour of the Senate President
to the tune of N2 billion adding that such allegation is weighty enough to
reduce his ruling to naught and therefore opted to step aside.
“In the instance case, I am already caught in
between two devils because any attempt to give the judgment in this matter,
even though it is ready for today, but, the attempt can be used by the wicked
people to justify their malicious publication against my person. In view
of this grievous allegation, even though my judgment in the matter is
ready, I have no option than to disqualify myself from proceeding to deliver
the judgment, because the malicious publication had already polluted the minds
of the general publication.
“So, I, hereby, disqualify myself from this case
and the case file shall be returned to the Chief Judge, Justice Ibrahim Auta,
for possible re- assignment to another Judge”, Justice Kafarati said.
Reacting to the development, senior lawyers
yesterday applauded his decision to withdraw from the suit in view of the
allegation stating that under the conventional norm, a judge should withdraw
from a suit in which he is alleged to have been induced for the sanctity of the
system.
Speaking on the development, Chief Robert Clarke
(SAN) said Justice Kafarati’s withdrawal from the case was honourable and
consistent with the ethics of the profession towards retaining public
confidence in the judiciary.
“A judge has an absolute discretion to withdraw
from a case if there are insinuations coming from either the media or the
accused himself challenging his right to give an honest opinion on a matter
before him. Definitely, I agree with him that there had been insinuations made
about him. So, I see nothing wrong in that”, Clarke said.
According to Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), “A judge
who is accused, rightly or wrongly, of bias in a case should withdraw from that
case honourably. and when a judge with a strong character like Kafarati feels
that his name is unnecessarily being maligned in the media, I believe he was
right to have voluntarily withdrawn from it”.
In its reaction, the Civil Liberties Organisation
(CLO) called for speedy and fair trial of the Senate President by the Code
of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) and charged the judiciary to ensure that the
withdrawal is not political as a means of buying time.
No comments:
Post a Comment