![]() |
| Gov. Ayo Fayose |
Incontrovertibly, since the mind-blowing revelations from the
former Secretary of Peoples Democratic Party, PDP in the State, Dr. Temitope
Aluko indicating and exposing how the controversial governor maneuvered the
electoral process and rode to the corridors of power alongside all the PDP
candidates in the state, the public have been subjected to confusions as to
what would be the next line of action putting into consideration that the
Supreme Court though deceived, had ruled on the matter based on false evidences
presented before it.
Incidentally, Fayose is presently clothed with immunity from
criminal prosecutions in line with Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria, and therefore will remain in office until his
tenure elapsed. Essentially, he would be shielded by res judicata which puts a
bar to all the courts to abide by the decisions of the superior court in the
land.
The All Progressive Congress, APC, his major contender in the
State has labeled the governor as a great threat to the democracy on account of
criminal dimensions adopted in delivering the State to his party, PDP. In
similar vein, notable Nigerians have frowned on the discoveries which
reasonably would amount to gross misconducts and lead to impeachment proceedings
by the Ekiti State House of Assembly. Unfortunately, he smartly secured almost
all the seats of the House through the same crooked and dubious means.
APC and the ruling party in the State have continued to trade
words indiscriminately accusing and counter-accuse each other. While the former
accuses the PDP of lack of integrity, the former alleges of plots of the APC to
create crises in the state.
“We want to remind Fayose that many of his party leaders who
still have a modicum of integrity, have also left in droves because they could
not stand the shame he has brought upon them through the Ekitigate scandal
planned and executed by him and some of his cohorts. Fayose is being hunted by
his criminal past and there is no way he will meet his comeuppance no matter
how he tries to evade justice”, APC Publicity Secretary, Mr. Taiwo Olatunbosun
stated.
Similarly, a senior Advocate of Nigeria, Chief Femi Falana did not mince words to has criticize the predicament stating that the governor should not use immunity to promote impunity. That’s remarkable but cannot change anything. Unless the apex court would be willing to review the judgment based on the fact that the principal witness in the appeal lied under oath and the evidences it used to arrive at its conclusion were “certified fake-copies”. The office of the governor however reacted and concluded that Falana was being partisan.
"The same Falana said in an interview in Punch newspaper on July 15, 2014 that Ekiti governorship election was not rigged and that Fayose won fair and square, only to come back close to 18 months after to say that the election was fraudulent. Honestly, Oga Femi Falana must hold in clear terms that his hypocrisy on Ekiti State politics, especially concerning Governor Fayose is fast turning to sound from a broken record. If he is pained with Fayose as his governor, he should wait till 2018 to try his luck and let's see how far he will be able to go," Lere Olaynka, Special Assistant to the Governor on Public Communications and New Media stated.
It would be recalled that the senior Advocate had earlier hailed
the judgment of the Supreme Court delivered on June 22, 2014 which affirmed the
election of Gov Fayose as duly elected and dismissed the appeal filed by the
APC’s candidate for lack of merit. Based on that, the State chapter of the PDP
in conjunction with the governor has continued to criticize Falana adding that
his actions amounted to “double standard” having stood by the Supreme Court
verdict earlier and now changed position.
Splendidly, neither the Supreme Court
nor Falana would be blamed as they arrived at the conclusions strictly based on
deductive reasoning vis-à-vis the
evidences presented before it without knowing that the evidences were cooked
up. The opponents of Falana were simply getting it wrong. It supported the verdict based on fraudulent evidences tendered before the court and with the present discovery, should rationally change position accordingly.
Following the deadly exposure, the governor immediately reported
the matter seeking for the prosecution of Aluko over alleged perjury knowing
that he (Fayose) cannot be prosecuted on account of his office as the governor
of a state recognized in Nigeria by the constitution.
Objectively, Fayose by the discovery masterminded the militarization
and printing of INEC’s ballot papers and other materials which contravened the
Electoral Act as well as the Criminal Code (Laws of the Federation), and could
be liable to terms of imprisonment if found guilty by a court of competent
jurisdiction. Indeed, the actions should be condemned in all quarters rather
than politicization. The ballot papers and all electoral materials are sacred
documents as important as the constitution of the country, hence should not be
swept under the carpet.
No doubt, the governor cannot be removed by any other means
except the State House of Assembly, however, criminal charges do not easily become
obsolete by time. Suffice to say that the governor on completion of his tenure could
be arrested and prosecuted to serve as deterrent to others. The evil days are therefore
awaiting Fayose after his tenure in office.

No comments:
Post a Comment