(Published by DAILY SUN on 29 December, 2016 at page 14)
By Carl Umegboro
THE Rivers rerun elections held on
December 10 for seats into the National Assembly had come and gone. Winners and
losers however, emerged. In sync with democratic norms, as results were
declared by the returning officers designated by the Independent National
Electoral Commission (INEC), those aggrieved over the outcomes of the election
should maintain decorum and seek for justice at the Election Tribunals. Heating
up the polity out of self-aggrandizements and insatiability is unreasonable. As it stands, Rivers peoples’ votes did count.
APC won and lost; PDP won and lost. Democracy demands that peoples votes must
count, and winners and losers must emerge. These are the governing elements of democratic
processes. For those that won, congratulations.
For those that lost, keep hopes
alive, tomorrow is yet another day. Post-election violence and political fanaticism
should be left behind. Those that boastfully threatened to pull down the system
should sheathe their swords. The preponderance is that the election was largely
violent free. To persistently push otherwise is idiosyncratic, myopic, recalcitrant
and egocentric. Essentially, the naming of a town, ‘Ogbunabali’ in Port
Harcourt which translates as ‘killers at night’ should be considerably
rechristened. The appellation invokes and endorses violence and criminalities.
Interestingly, the major contenders;
All Progressives Congress (APC) and Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) being the
ruling parties at the federal and state levels respectively strategically took
advantage of their positions. While the state government suddenly inaugurated multiple
fresh road projects in some strategic areas a week prior to the election as a
political gimmick alongside other coded moves, the federal government
intensified on economic empowerment through the Niger Delta Development
Commission (NDDC) particularly the amnesty programmes. Ultimately, democracy in
Rivers won. Furthermore, as a move to thwart any coded deals between the
Divisional Police Officers (DPOs) and politicians from both political parties,
the Inspector General of Police (IGP) thoughtfully opted for a Tsunami
technique; transferred all serving senior police officers from the areas with
immediate effect a week ahead of the elections. By implications, those that
selfishly mobilized these officers with funds for coded jobs for the elections certainly
lost the money as refund is not permissible on such coded deals. This was
followed by the unprecedented invasion of the state by fresh security
operatives, which continues to attract unending criticisms from state
government, albeit strategically to counter recurrences of violence undeniably dominant
in the state over the years. Whatever tears, crocodile or otherwise, election
is over, hence, live and let live.
From the hubbub; 28,000 regular
policemen, 5,000 Special Anti-robbery Squad (SARS) personnel, 28,000 soldiers
of the Nigerian Army, 5,000 men from the Navy and Airforce, 15,000 from
Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps and 15,000 other personnel from
sundry para-military agencies were lavishly deployed by the federal government
during the election. Unfortunately, under the laws, the president committed no
offence for dispatching such numbers to ensure a hitch-free election provided
the operatives allowed freedom of movement and operated reasonably within their
statutory limits. As a matter of fact, such numbers could be tripled if the
presidency considers it necessary. The unending hullabaloo over the action is
uncalled for, and connotes ulterior motives over the election, and the
President owes no explanation on the number of operatives he wishes to use in
protecting lives and properties; his primary obligation as provided in Section
14 (2) (b) of the 1999 Constitution, Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Interestingly, civilization has made
it possible that where intimidations, electoral thefts or other form of drifts
occurred, the use of electronic devises and cameras by witnesses could show
them clearly as transpired. The Rivers rerun irrespective of few alleged
inadequacies was a huge success on account of the minimal casualties recorded
during the election. It is aggregately abysmal for political leaders who armed
themselves with adequate security to be inciting the public into fomenting
troubles. Life is sacred and leaders are under obligation to ensuring that human
lives are maximally protected. It is also important to note that under
democracy, a governor or president is only allowed to cast a vote in registered
polling unit and not to convert to election monitor as witnessed in the
election. The election officials including accredited observers are only valid
resource persons for an election. Hence, the discipline of a police officer
attached to Gov. Nyesom Wike that led him across polling units he wasn’t
supposed to appear during the elections was apt.
The best any governor can do ahead of
election towards ensuring its free and fair is to supportively provide
sufficient electronic gadgets to the accredited observers and his party agents
for recordings and instant updates, but to be part of the election that is
being conducted by an independent body outside the executive arm is grotesque,
and inconsistent with independence of the electoral body. Apparently, civilization
has dealt a big blow to election riggers as results are now known prior to the
announcements. Hence, as a civic responsibility, record any inconsistent behaviour
of candidates, politicians, electoral officers or security operatives at the
polling units and forward to the media instantly, and it is settled. Needless
taking laws into the hands. But for a political leader who is optimally
surrounded alongside family members by combatant personnel to be inciting the
vulnerable citizens for violence, anyway, it is condemnable and unfortunate.
Umegboro is a public
affairs analyst and publisher
- To trace in DAILY SUN,click here: http://sunnewsonline.com/still-on-rivers-rerun-elections/
No comments:
Post a Comment